How Your First RMD at 73 Can Spike Medicare Costs for a Year
Turning 73 triggers your first required IRA withdrawal — and that income spike can push you over the IRMAA threshold, hiking Medicare premiums.
Here's a retirement tax trap most people don't see coming: the moment you hit 73 and take your first required minimum distribution, that extra income hits your tax return — and Medicare notices. The income-related monthly adjustment amount, known as IRMAA, uses your tax return from two years prior to set your Medicare Part B and Part D premiums. One big RMD can quietly shove you past a cliff you didn't know existed.
The math stings. IRMAA surcharges stack in tiers, so even landing just a dollar over a threshold means you're paying the higher premium rate for the entire following year. There's no smoothing, no proration. You blow past the line once, you pay the full penalty bracket for twelve straight months. That's the cliff part — and your first RMD is often large enough to do exactly that.
Read more Why Using Your 401(k) to Pay Off Credit Cards Can Backfire →
Why is the first one so dangerous? If you delayed taking Social Security and let your IRA compound untouched, the account balance going into age 73 could be substantial. A bigger balance means a bigger mandatory withdrawal — and a bigger income number sitting on that tax return two years later. Timing and account size conspire against you.
The tradeable lesson here is to plan before you turn 73, not after. Roth conversions in your 60s or early 70s can drain pre-tax balances now, reducing the RMD hit later. Some advisors also flag qualified charitable distributions as a way to satisfy part of the RMD without that amount counting as income at all — keeping your MAGI below the IRMAA tripwire.
Bottom line: your RMD isn't just a tax event. It's a Medicare premium event that echoes for a full year. Get ahead of it or pay up. Continue reading at Yahoo Finance.
